The only thing worse than the person in charge who's willing to sacrifice the lives of others (but not themselves) is all the people who go along with it.
A striking example of the fact that the human race is still, in the grand scheme of things, about as mature as a little child.
by Jack London (1876-1916)was first published in The Nation, July 29, 1911.
II
The game is usually between two people (any more than three and the game becomes difficult), who each have a full deck of cards.
Each player turns over the top card on their pile at the same time. The player with the highest card wins the other player's card. (The card with the lowest value is 2 and the greatest is an ace.) If both players have a card of equal value, then the next card is shown until someone has a card larger than everyone elses.
Repeat until someone runs out of cards, then count all of the cards won by each side. The player with the highest number of cards wins the war.
The young, the uneducated and the people without memory will remember Operation Desert Storm. Sending out young men to kick ass somewhere far, far away.
Video game war. "Wow, did you see that bridge collapse ?" war. Couple of weeks later, justice and peace have been restored, the young men, now turned into heroes, return. Cool !So - that is war ? Sounds like something we should do more often, imagine all the cool war movies ! And I can go and shoot some evil foreigner, just like uncle Joey !
Enough, already. War is not a glorious adventure, war means killing people. Violence. Going home (if you still can) to find your home burned down, your kids killed, your wife raped. The evil foreigner to kill might be you. Maybe you are lucky. The company you worked for has been bombed. Getting a new job ? Sure - difficult to do after you lost a leg in the mine field. (Did you really believe that your college degree and a couple of weeks of basic training make you invulnerable ? That the enemy only employs people who can't shoot ?)
War is delightful to those who have never experienced it. - Desiderius Erasmus, Dulce bellum inexpertis, 1515
- Desiderius Erasmus, Dulce bellum inexpertis, 1515
Warre is alwayes a physick too strong, which entring the body with a force greater than the infirmity, must needs increase the distemper, and like thunder purging the bad qualities, corrupt the good. - Anthony Ashcam, A Discourse wherein is examined, what is particularly lawfull during confusions and revolutions of government, (1648)
- Anthony Ashcam, A Discourse wherein is examined, what is particularly lawfull during confusions and revolutions of government, (1648)
There never was a good war or a bad peace. - Benjamin Franklin, Letter to Josiah Quincy, September 11, 1773
- Benjamin Franklin, Letter to Josiah Quincy, September 11, 1773
War's a game, which, were their subjects wise, kings would not play at. - William Cowper, "The Winter Morning Walk," 1783
- William Cowper, "The Winter Morning Walk," 1783
My first wish is to see this plague to mankind banished from off the Earth, and the sons and daughters of this world employed in more pleasing and innocent amusements than in preparing implements and exercising them for the destruction of mankind. - George Washington, speaking of war, letter to David Humphreys, July 25, 1785
- George Washington, speaking of war, letter to David Humphreys, July 25, 1785
War is Hell. - William Tecumseh Sherman, speech of August 11, 1880, Columbus, Ohio
- William Tecumseh Sherman, speech of August 11, 1880, Columbus, Ohio
War is a contagion. - Franklin Delano Roosevelt, speech of October 5, 1937, Chicago
- Franklin Delano Roosevelt, speech of October 5, 1937, Chicago
I hate war as only a soldier who has lived it can, only as one who has seen its brutality, its futility, its stupidity. - Dwight Eisenhower, speech of January 10, 1946, Ottawa, Canada
- Dwight Eisenhower, speech of January 10, 1946, Ottawa, Canada
War. What is it good for? Absolutely nothing. - Edwin Starr, "War" (song, 1970)
- Edwin Starr, "War" (song, 1970)
War, a contest between nations and States (international war), or between parties in the same State (civil war), carried on by force of arms, and resorted to either for purposes of advantage or of revenge. Formerly, war was waged at the will of despotic monarchs; now wars usually arise, in the first instance, from disputes concerning territorial possessions and frontiers, unjust dealings with the citizens of one State by another, questions of race and sentiment, jealousy of military prestige, or mere lust of conquest. Civil wars arise from the claims of rival competitors for the supreme power in a State, or for the establishment of some important point connected with civil or religious liberty. In all cases, the object of each contending party is to destroy the power of the other by defeating or dispersing his army or navy, by the occupation of some important part of his country, such as the capital, or the principal administrative and commercial centers, or the ruin of his commerce, thus cutting off his sources of recuperation in men, money, and material. An international or public war can only be authorized by the sovereign power of the nations, and previous to the commencement of hostilities it is now usual for the State taking the initiative to issue a declaration of war, which usually takes the form of an explanatory manifesto addressed to the neutral States. An aggressive or offensive war is one carried into the territory of a hitherto friendly power; and a defensive war is one carried on to resist such aggression. Certain laws, usages, or rights of war are recognized by international law. By such laws it is allowable to seize and destroy the persons or property of armed enemies, to stop up all their channels of traffic or supply, and to appropriate everything in an enemy's country necessary for the support of subsistence of the invading army. On the other hand, though an enemy may lawfully be starved into a surrender, wounding, except in battle, mutilation, and all cruel and wanton devastation, are contrary to the usages of war, as are also the bombarding of a defenseless town, firing on a hospital, the use of poison in any way, or torture to extort information from an enemy.
Entry from Everybody's Cyclopedia, 1912.
War is transspecies, and so, shouldn't be over-anthromorphicized, for example, as merely "a result of human stupidity". Other primates, particularly anthropoids, including chimpanzees engage in social warfare, as do ants, of course, amongst other species. However unpleasant, wars can't, therefore, be entirely un-natural or accidental.
Wars over resources, food and land are common across species. The Agricultural Revolution in human pre-history greatly stepped up the pace and violence of human warfare however, as it meant that large food stocks had to be preserved between seasons and could be reserved for hard times over several seasons. In times of famine these non-portable food stocks had to be defended in place, while they might mean survival to an attacking tribe that would otherwise starve. This can be seen in the pre-Columbian history and pre-history of the New World, as well as that of the Old.
The evils of "patriarchy" and caste systems are largely the effects of warfare: when a society was conquered and held by other's swords, as happened in ancient Rome, India, and China, those swords were being held captive by males, who would then appropriate most power in that society for themselves. Similarly, the second highest caste is usually the remnant population of the second-last conquering tribe or nation, and so on - with many conquests, India developed many layers of castes, with the most aboriginal population generally at the bottom.
Unfortunately, the capacity for warfare creates a "Prisoner's Dilemma" (from the mathematics of