A short squeeze is one of the most spectacular, and, for some people,
dangerous things in finance. In order to see what it is and why it
happens, we will first discuss the practice of selling
short. We will then discuss the conditions under which a short squeeze
can occur. Finally, a stunning recent example will be discussed.
A short squeeze can occur in any physical security. This includes
things like stocks and bonds. Of these physical securities,
only a finite amount exists. A company may have 1 million shares, and they
cannot be created by trading. This contrasts with options, which
are contracts that can be created. In principle, it is not
possible to sell a physical thing you don't have, as you cannot deliver
the asset - let us for the moment assume it is a share. What you can do
is agree with the owner of the shares to borrow them, giving the
owner of the physical shares a fee and the pledge to return them if
asked. You also pay the owner a small fee. You now own the shares, and
can sell them in the market. If the shares drop, you can buy them back at a
lower price, and give them back to the owner, and you stop paying the fee. The key here is that at
any time, the lender can ask you to return the shares, and you will have to
do so, buying them back at the current level.
The worst situation that can happen when you are short is that the
stock goes up. You will then have to buy back at a higher level. The
danger here is that being short means you cannot sit and wait for the
share price to return. First of all, there is the perpetual risk of
having to deliver the shares to the borrower if asked. Secondly, a share
can rise to very high levels. Being long, you can at most lose the
investment. Being short, the potential loss is unlimited. Hence, being
short, a stock can always rise to a level at which you are forced to
liquidate - time is working against you and you cannot just
"sit and wait".
For a short squeeze to occur, there have to be two factors. Firstly,
the stock has to rise, so short sellers are facing losses. Secondly, it
must be difficult to buy the security. This may, for instance, happen
when the amount of shares that are traded is not large because the bulk
of the shares is held by big investors who won't sell. In this case, the
following may happen. One of the people who is short just cannot bear the
losses or the risk anymore and is forced to
liquidate. As mentioned, this is not easy. There are few
shares available, and buying drives up the price. This
price rise causes losses in other market participants, who also see the
liquidity in the share drying up. They have large losses, in fact, they
may be so large that they too are forced to either post capital to cover
these losses, or to close the position. If one of them decides to close the
position, the stock price rises further and losses mount for the other
short sellers. The resulting spiral can drive prices to insane levels -
a short squeeze can easily quadruple the value of a share or worse. This
leads to losses far worse than what could happen in the case of a
bankruptcy in case you are long. This is why a short squeeze is so
dangerous: there is no limit to the loss, hence, weathering the storm may
not be an option. Hence, a large short position in a relatively
illiquid share is dangerous.
Recently, there was a massive short squeeze in Volkswagen.
Volkswagen is a German car manufacturer. Porsche owns around 43% of the
shares, the German state of Lower Saxony owns another 20%. Volkswagen is a
fairly large part of the Xetra DAX index. This means people building a
fund that tracks the index will have to buy the shares in
order to do so. This accounts for a few percent of the shares. Hence, about
65% -70% of the shares is accounted for. Volkswagen was a popular
short for the following reasons:
- Car makers were expected to be hammered by the recession.
- There is a strategy in which the preferential
shares of Volkswagen are bought and the regular shares sold. Logically,
these shares should be worth almost the same; the main difference is the
prefs do not carry voting rights. Note
that these shares are not fungible: if you short-sold the share,
delivering the pref to the lender won't do.
On Sunday October 26th 2008, Porsche announced they had options in
different German banks that would allow them to buy another 31.5% of
Volkswagen. We can safely assume the banks
hedged these options by
buying shares of Volkswagen, to the tune of exactly 31.5% (The fact that
these options were cash-settled offers another possibility for
mischief
I won't go into). This means about 95-100% of Volkswagen shares are
accounted for. The
hedge funds shorting were short about 13%
of
Volkswagen in total. Porsche also remarked they were doing this
announcement to give short sellers the opportunity to close their position
in an orderly fashion.
Monday morning, Volkswagen spiked from about 250 to over 1000 euros. At
that price, Volkswagen was theoretically the largest company in the world.
The hedge funds were left with about 40 billion euros in (theoretical)
losses. There was almost no liquidity. People selling the shares
at 1000 made a killing. The DAX also spiked up. This situation simmered for
about a week until two things happened:
- In an unprecedented move, the weight of Volkswagen in the DAX was
reduced. This means that index trackers had to sell Volkswagen at that very
high price point, locking in a considerable profit for their investors.
- Porsche announced they would sell 5% of their holdings.
Both of these actions released
shares. Of course, Porsche made a
killing on this, far more than on the sale of their
cars. In fact,
many of their
customers are the very hedge fund managers that
were hit; Porsche found a more direct way than selling cars to get their
money. People investing in the DAX also made a lot of money. Because the
end of the squeeze caused a price drop, the hedge funds didn't lose the
full 40 billion, although the losses are of that magnitude.
In summary, a short squeeze is the sudden rise of the share price due
to people being forced to liquidate their short positions. This is
particularly likely in relatively illiquid shares with a large amount of
short selling. The results can be devastating, as the loss can be
unlimited.