Everything2
Near Matches
Ignore Exact
Full Text
Everything2

U2

"U2" is also a: user

created by hartp

(idea) by karrenlouise (2.1 mon) (print)   ?   (I like it!) 1 C! Wed Jul 18 2001 at 5:47:07

a discussion on U2's growth as a band

* * * *

There are many U2 fans who prefer the albums of the 1980s to those of the 1990s, or vice versa, but whatever the argument is there, it is generally agreed that Achtung Baby(1991) was the bridge between the two styles. There are distincively different tones and styles in the albums that make up Pre- and Post- Achtung Baby.

Some of the Early U2 fans would argue that The Joshua Tree was the last good album U2 put out, or that Achtung Baby was the beginning of the end -- in that it led to Zooropa.

I can understand this attitude; The Joshua Tree was the first U2 Album I invested in. I remember hearing Pop on the radio, but that I was never hit hard by such singles as Staring at the Sun or Last Night on Earth. It wasn't until I picked up Achtung Baby and dedicated myself to it that I really gave (or had any desire to give) Pop and Zooropa a chance.

* * * *

Achtung Baby doesn't quite fit in with the other albums. It is definitely past the Early U2 stuff -- The Joshua Tree culminated that era -- and yet Achtung Baby is not quite as extreme on the U2 Spectrum as Pop and Zooropa. Achtung Baby's singles managed to maintain U2's mass appeal while the album was just another piece of evidence that U2's music was evolving into a completely different style. Simply compare Mysterious Ways and One to any of their older hits. But however similar Achtung Baby is in style to Zooropa and Pop, it didn't create the controversy that Zooropa gave birth to.

* * * *

What changed U2? What happened between The Joshua Tree and Achtung Baby? How could the same band produce The Joshua Tree and Zooropa (One an ultimate favourite, the other an ultimate failure) with only one album in between? Doesn't Pop seem to fit in better between Achtung Baby and Zooropa? Did U2 finally learn the lesson and appease us with All that You Can't Leave Behind? What changed U2?

U2's method of expression, lyrics and overall style may have changed, but the substance remained pure U2. Every album has Bono's eternal anthems of love and religion (or some sort of combination of the two) and the Edge's guitar. While not all fans enjoyed U2's albums of the 90s, many found a striking chord in the much-debated Zooropa or Pop. These fans saw what many critics couldn't, or wouldn't, see: that " ... this was just the end of something for U2 ... it wasn't a big deal, it was just -- they had to go away and ... and dream it all up again" (Bono, 1989).

July 17th, 2001




disclaimer: I happen to like Zooropa. When I wrote 'an ultimate failure', I was referring to the general fan base.

(thing) by agoodmixture (2.7 mon) (print)   ?   (I like it!) 1 C! Wed Dec 12 2001 at 2:20:44

A footnote to this last node: Agreed that Actung Baby seems to have come out of nowhere; the moody experimentation, the distorted, gnarled guitar aesthetic, the emphasis on interpersonal relations (and, especially, upon sexual relations) over anthemic political or love songs: there was no hint of this anywhere in the entire back catalogue of U2.

BUT

To consider Zooropa a failure is deeply unfair by any and all standards. Critically, it was their best-recieved album (for good reason, more on this later) outside, perhaps, The Joshua Tree. Commercially, it moved its fair share of units (though perhaps not compared to Actung Baby) and spawned the band's most imaginative and successful tour: Zoo TV - where Bono's now infamous Macphisto character found its origin.

This album was imagined completely on the road. Meaning that any of its songs found their origin outside of the studio entirely. That U2 would produce a decent album, let alone a truly great album, was not anticipated.

But they produced a masterpiece. Some people slagged Zooropa off (as they would subsequently do for POP) as merely U2's fling with dance music. This is unfair for several reasons. First of all, the band had been flirting with dance rythyms, really, since War - just check out the backbeat to Seconds.

Second of all, the emotional power of the album itself. As one reviewer put it, the opening moments of the first track alone demonstrated that U2 could wring maximum raw emotion out of a mere note or two.

Witness the power of the themes that run through the album: love, power, sex, death, God, art. Bono was perhaps at his most subtle as a lyricist when he approached this album, and it shows in his careful, almost opaque handling of difficult subjects as pornography (Babyface), ennui (Numb, Daddy's Gonna Pay for Your Crashed Car), and most difficultly of all, suicide, in the immensely powerful closer The Wanderer.

Witness the sheer intregue of the songs themselves: the moody, ambient, powerful opening of Zooropa, the operatic, emotive texture of Lemon, the self-consciousless nostalgia of Stay, the sheer beauty of Bono and The Edge's harmonies on The Wanderer (not to mention Johnny Cash's stunning lead vocals), and the emotional vulnerability of The First Time - U2's most romantic song ever.

Finally, witness the band's quenchless desire for experimentation and inventiveness. Two songs feature lead vocals by singers other than Bono; only one other U2 album has risked this, and one on Zooropa became a hit single: Numb. There are tape loops buried into Numb, Bukowski references in Dirty Day, innovative sampling and production throughout -- the result of the band's growing intimacy with Brian Eno as co-producer. Daddy's Gonna Pay for Your Crashed Car starts off with Russian propoganda music.

In conclusion, I submit that Zooropa reflects not a band groping with an artistic failure, but in production of one of its most remarkable and imaginative successes. Rarely do musical talent, emotional expression, and desire for experimentation intersect on single songs; on Zooropa, each and every tune manages to reflect all three.

(thing) by WaldemarExkul (4.2 d) (print)   ?   (I like it!) Thu Aug 08 2002 at 15:50:21

U2 is a pilsner beer brewed by Unibroue since 1999. It is redder in colour than Unibroue's other laconically named pilsner, U, to which it is a sort of sequel, if beers can be said to have sequels. Alcohol content 5% by volume.

Source: http://www.unibroue.com/products/u2.cfm (English), http://www.unibroue.com/produits/u2.cfm (French).


printable version
chaos

The Edge Bono The Joshua Tree Pop
All That You Can't Leave Behind Achtung Baby Zooropa U2 Faraway So Close
On your knees boy REM U2 and Heroin Bono on America
The most wonderful girl in the world War Windows NT The Unforgettable Fire
Fox Mulder Macphisto Francis Gary Powers Monty Python
Quake Arena boy Enya U-2 RECON
Y'know, if you log in, you can write something here, or contact authors directly on the site. Create a New User if you don't already have an account.
  Epicenter
Login
Password

password reminder
register

Everything2 Help

Cool Staff Picks
Just another sprinkling of indeterminacy
Miscarriage
Chicken pox
Planck units
Masada
Sembazuru
women's clothing size woes
Maria Montessori
lift yr. skinny fists like antennas to heaven!
Integration
Empedocles
p-n junction
Here lies one whose name was writ in water
blackbody radiation
New Writeups
Alnilamski
Rebel Yell(thing)
Heisenberg
Dahon Speed D7(thing)
etgar
Protection of civil rights in the USA and UK(essay)
archiewood
Airspace classifications(idea)
Ouzo
My first Christmas(event)
TheDeadGuy
Editor Log: August 2008(log)
AspieDad
Tools of the Trade(essay)
Apatrix
Editor Log: August 2008(log)
etouffee
Back where we started(poetry)
NeverLost
I'm never getting drunk again(idea)
Noung
post-racial(idea)
Heitah
Intensive farming(essay)
XWiz
Big Science(review)
Wuukiee
yellow cake batter(recipe)
Pavlovna
Sassenach(person)
E2 is a by-product of the existence of The Everything Development Company