Inverse Cost and Quality Law

created by tallman

(idea) by tallman (1.1 mon) (print) ? I like it! Tue Nov 13 2001 at 18:37:13

The paradoxical Inverse Cost and Quality Law (ICQL) "states very simply that the larger a movie's budget is, the shittier that movie is going to be." It was formulated by David Foster Wallace in his essay entitled "F/X Porn".

In financial terms, a film that would cost hundreds of millions of dollars to make is going to get financial backing if and only if its investors can be assured that at the very least they will break even. In other words, an expensive movie must not fail. To accomplish this feat, the films producers strictly adhere to certain reliable formulae that have been shown by precedent to maximally ensure a runaway hit. Ironically, since these reliable formulae are undoubtedly awful and insipid, an even heavier burden of importance is placed on the film's special effects, thus driving up costs and yielding two corollary formulations of the ICQL:

"The more lavish and spectacular a movie's special effects, the shittier that movie is going to be in all non-F/X respects."
"There is no quicker or more efficient way to kill what is interesting and original about an interesting, original young director than to give that director a huge budget and lavish F/X resources."

The example Wallace focuses on during the course of the essay is James Cameron's Terminator 2: Judgment Day, which exhibits many ideas of the Inverse Cost and Quality Law. First, T2 has a rediculously large budget (thanks mostly to its mindbending special effects). And second, the story is riddled with many types of the aformentioned reliable formulae (big name star in Schwarzenegger, the idea that a terminator was "reprogrammed" to protect, the buddy premise of bonding between a robot and a smartass kid, etc...)

Info taken from David Foster Wallace's article in the Winter/Spring 1998 edition of Waterstone's Magazine. Full text can be found here:
http://www.smallbytes.net/~bobkat/waterstone.html

printable version
chaos

David Foster Wallace	Terminator 2: Judgement Day	A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again	Infinite Jest
Earnshaw's Theorem	F/X	investor	reliable
Terminator Paradoxes	Director	Runaway	T2
Arnold Schwarzenegger	Terminator	James Cameron	special effects

Y'know, if you log in, you can write something here, or contact authors directly on the site. Create a New User if you don't already have an account.

Login
Password

remember me
password reminder
register

Everything2 Help

Nodes your sibling would have liked:
Judge not, lest ye be judged
John F. Kennedy
Happy Pizza
Sembazuru
Flatland: Table of Contents
Bunyip
Polish pronunciation
Red Dawn
How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
Live and Let Die
Merry Christmas vs. Happy Holidays
Windows Error Lookup Guide
chemotaxis

Dreamvirus
the kingdom of now	(poetry)
Gryffon
balls out	(idea)
originalzin
The Healing Place	(place)
TheLady
Why I love Everything2	(essay)
jjen
Why I love Everything2	(personal)
AspieDad
Fighting someone else's battle	(idea)
santo
Rock Band vs. Guitar Hero III	(essay)
impishlaugh
Threshold	(idea)
maxClimb
May 21, 2008	(log)
Rancid_Pickle
I Wish Momma Sang the Blues	(fiction)
dannye
Lars and the Real Girl	(review)
Glowing Fish
Educational gender gap	(idea)
Venkman
Persimmon pudding	(recipe)
aneurin
Hilary Armstrong	(person)
giantcactus
The Power of Electricity	(personal)

E2 is a by-product of the existence of The Everything Development Company