E2 hardlinks and the ideal reader

If your node is about Peter Jazzpianoplayer, you can make it into:

[avant-garde jazz piano|Peter Jazzpianoplayer]

This way, you're free to point people in more directions by linking to more relevant information. I'd personally guess a lot of folks wouldn't know what avant-garde meant, so I'd hardlink it as [avant-garde], but make sure that where you link it to is correct. If avant-garde is noded as avant garde with no hyphen, pipelink yours to [avant garde|avant-garde].

Now, with jazz piano, you can break it down into two related links:
[jazz] and [jazz piano|piano]

Now, you're sending them exactly where you want them to go to learn more about your specific topic.

I will see if avant-garde jazz pianist already exists as a node. Most of the time, that specific wording isn't a node, but let's say, there is write-up for avant-garde jazz. I would hardlink to that. The bigger the idea that it encompasses, the more likely someone who clicks on it will be interested as well.

Don't forget to friggin softlink!@#

Okay so the hardlink problem is solved. It links to the node that will have the most relevant information. What if I want to know what the hell avant-garde is? I'd have to type it in the search box and try to find the correct spelling, and after all of that it might not be the node I even want!

Take the time to go through your nodes, and softlink pertinent information. A well-written (including linking) write-up only improves E2.