Everything2
Near Matches
Ignore Exact
Full Text
Everything2

Blue Eye / Brown Eye experiment

created by Baron_Saturday

(idea) by Baron_Saturday (6.9 y) (print)   ?   (I like it!) 2 C!s Wed Dec 06 2000 at 12:26:54

Blue Eye/Brown Eye is an experiment performed by Jane Elliot in 1968 on the day after Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated to demonstrate what prejudice was to her third grade class. The basic idea was to separate the class into two halves - those with blue eyes and those with brown. She then told them that the children with blue eyes were inherently inferior to the children with brown eyes - they were denied access to play equipment, they were told they were stupid, and they were not allowed to socialize with members of the 'superior group'. The next day the roles were reversed, with the blue-eyed children treated as better.

The idea behind the experiment was to show the children first hand what prejudice was like. In this it was a success: on days when students were part of the inferior group, they showed lower test scores, less enthusiasm, and more hostility towards activities in the classroom.

The experiment has since been repeated with dramatic results elsewhere, with both children and adults. There are of course some major ethical questions raised by the original experiment - particularly the concept of 'informed consent'.

(thing) by Lometa (10.6 hr) (print)   ?   (I like it!) 6 C!s Fri Dec 08 2000 at 17:58:02

Jane Elliott was an elementary-school teacher in hometown of Riceville, Iowa. The "hero of the month" in Elliott's fourth-grade class was Dr. Martin Luther King and Elliot was convinced that "what he was doing was right for all of us, not just for blacks." When King was shot the students wanted to know why their hero had been killed. It was then that the teacher decided to teach her students from this all white community about racism.

She questioned the kids about what they thought a black person was, even though they had never met one. Their responses were especially vicious.

"They're dirty," "They stink," "They don't smell good," "They riot, they steal," "You can't trust them, my dad says they better not try to move in next door to us."

It was time for an evaluation of these horrifying responses and what follows is the content of the lesson plan. The students would reveal without a doubt to her that racism was created.

She divided the class into two groups: the brown eyes and the blue eyes. Anyone not fitting these categories, such as those with green or hazel eyes, was considered an outsider and did not actively participate in the exercise. Elliott told her children that brown-eyed people were superior to blue-eyed due to the amount of the color-causing-chemical, melanin, in their blood.

Elliot said that blue-eyed people were stupid and lazy and not to be trusted. To ensure that the eye color differentiation could be made swiftly, Elliott handed out strips of cloth that fastened at the neck as collars. The brown eyes gleefully affixed the cloth-made shackles on their blue-eyed counterparts.

Next Elliott withdrew her blue-eyed students' basic classroom rights, such as drinking directly from the water fountain or taking a second helping at lunch. Brown-eyed kids, on the other hand, received preferential treatment. In addition to being permitted to boss around the blues, the browns were given an extended recess.

Elliott recalls, "It was just horrifying how quickly they became what I told them they were." Within 30 minutes, a blue-eyed girl named Carol had regressed from a "brilliant, self-confident carefree, excited little girl to a frightened, timid, uncertain little almost-person."

On the flip side, the brown-eyed children excelled under their newfound superiority. Elliott had seven students with dyslexia in her class that year and four of them had brown eyes. On the day that the browns were "on top," those four brown-eyed boys with dyslexia read words that Elliott "knew they couldn't read" and spelled words that she "knew they couldn't spell."*

Seeing her brown-eyed students act like "arrogant, ugly, domineering, overbearing White Americans" with no instructions to do so proved to Elliott that racism is learned. Prior to that day in 1968, her students had expressed neither positive nor negative thoughts about each other based on eye color. Yes, Elliott taught them that it was all right to judge one another based on eye color, but she did not teach them how to oppress. "They already knew how to be racist because every one of them knew without my telling them how to treat those who were on the bottom," says Elliott.

That day, Elliott discovered that "you can create racism. And, as with anything, if you can create it, you can destroy it." For 14 out of the next 16 years that Elliott taught in Riceville, she conducted the exercise. In the white enclave of Riceville, fighting racism was not looked upon by most as an honorable duty. As a result of her work, kids beat up her own children. Her parents' business lost customers. Elliott and her family received regular death threats. And each fall, parents called Elliott's principal and said, "I don't want my kid in that nigger-lover's classroom!"

Not everyone was against Elliott. She believes that 80 percent of the people in Riceville were compassionate, caring people who were concerned about their school and their kids and their community. But, says Elliott, the 20 percent, the vocal, vicious minority, intimidated the rest of them. It seemed as though the only Ricevilleans strong enough to stand up to this vicious minority were Elliott's students. After participating in the exercise, says Elliott, her students went home and argued with their fathers about racism. Imagine: 8-year-old children telling their parents that they were wrong.

In the1980's Elliot began to do her Blue Eye / Brown Eye experiment for corporations who felt their companies were in need of diversity training challenging racist behavior and thought. Since then there have been great strides in becoming aware of racism in America and even though not all whites are racists, unfortunately all blacks still face racism in their lives, the question of racism is always present.

Elliott emphasizes her point in her speeches on college campuses, she wants people to begin to "recognize racism when they see it, know that it is a choice that we make and that we can choose to not go along with racism." It is not a black problem, explains Elliott, racism is a "white attitudinal problem." For too many years we have been blaming racism on people of color, says Elliott. We have thought, "If you people would just get white we'd all be all right." Wrong. If people would just accept that, as Elliott says, "we are all different and have the right to be so," it will all be all right.

Although I've never had the opportunity to teach this lesson in a classroom. And I have never heard the issue of informed consent raised in my community. This is not a scientific experiment, a drama nor an act, but a lesson plan. Elliott's objective as she states, is to have the students define for themselves what and where their racisms derived from, to learn that racism is created and to understand that everyone is subject to a set of prejudices and how to recognize them. My son says that he learned ".... how unfair racism is and to treat all people equally." It's been an established lesson plan for well over twenty years and a professional teacher doesn't need consent to do his or her job.... to teach. Both of my sons have 'gone through the experiment' and their understanding is that we all have our own set of prejudices. A good lesson to learn about life anywhere.

Excerpted from:
Horizon: People and Possibilities The Eyes of Jane Elliott:
http://www.horizonmag.org


(idea) by DoctorNo (5.4 y) (print)   ?   (I like it!) Fri Aug 10 2001 at 3:09:15

As a person who was subjected to this experiment, I have to say this: It's dumb, many people know about it, and it makes you (the person administering the experiment) look SOOOOO presumptuous. The effect was totally lost on me since I'd seen the PBS special some time before.

It may have some value, in that it shows people just how stupidly they can behave, but it is a very played-out and sometimes cruel sociological device. However, like I said, if even one person in the group knows what you are doing, they are not going to get anything out of it, and may actively try to throw a wrench into the works. I certainly did.

Let's go into the informed consent thing mentioned by Baron Saturday, above. I don't appreciate being used as some kind of weird guinea pig, especially at the behest of some youth leader who is getting incredible kicks out of watching a process he started to affect everyone except himself. I wasn't amused by the tedium of the other youth leaders pretending to give me the evil eye, nor by the order to sit on the ground. Oh, and look, now we're being told to trade places with the "oppressors." Fabulous! Now we get to treat them like they treated us!!! HOORAY.

Later, as we were discussing it, I said that I didn't particularly associate myself with the whole experience, that I didn't feel a part of the group, either as oppressed or oppressors. Because no one else felt that way (or had the guts to stand up and say so), I was obviously wrong. I might have forgot to mention that I'd seen the PBS special beforehand. :)

So, to recap: Don't do this experiment. Seriously, don't. Humans are not toys for use in fueling your private ego trip. True, some of your subjects may appreciate the experiment, or at least feign appreciation so as not to seem the odd one out. However, I can virtually guarantee that some of your subjects will not appreciate being treated like pawns.


(idea) by Whipster (3.6 wk) (print)   ?   (I like it!) Thu Aug 23 2001 at 20:33:24

Strictly speaking, this does not constitute an experiment - rather, it is a work of drama; a play to be acted out.

Were it an actual scientific experiment, it would have to be administered in a double-blind fashion. As described here, the teacher (experimenter) is likely to unduly influence the results by imposing his/her own values and preconceptions. Likewise, as stated by DoctorNo, the subjects of the "experiment" can also impose their own values and opinions on the outcome.

The only thing this fabricated social drama proves decisively is that humans, like many other mammals, have a strong urge to establish hierarchy and "pecking order".


printable version
chaos

Rape committed by women Don't call me white Informed consent Stanford Prison experiment
Any sufficiently nice person is indistinguishable from someone who likes you The customs of your tribe are not laws of nature Rosenthal effect If we define things as unreal, they may still be real in their consequences
reverse racism The social construction of reality Race is a myth The Wave
Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego Obedience to Authority Jane Elliott heteroflexible
Thirty Second Rule dyslexia Windows Protection Error. System halted. Prejudice and discrimination suffered by mentally ill people
pecking order double-blind experiment They try to be quiet but you know they are there with their weird coppery breath.
Y'know, if you log in, you can write something here, or contact authors directly on the site. Create a New User if you don't already have an account.
  Epicenter
Login
Password

password reminder
register

Everything2 Help


cooled by jessicapierce

Cool Staff Picks
Drink up!
flying boat
Watching Robyn Hitchcock
HOT DAMN!: Drinking, Debauchery, and Dastardly Deeds
Our eyes reflect the light of dead suns
the use-mention distinction
The Strong Programme
Her name was Natalie
Musikalisches Opfer
In the Aeroplane Over the Sea
Frida Kahlo
Artemisia
Somewhere there's a god who wants me
Look, look! I can write inane bullshit too!
New Writeups
octillion369
Frost wyrm(person)
kalen
Three "T"s(idea)
octillion369
Undead(idea)
archiewood
Ico(fiction)
Heisenberg
Why I love Everything2(log)
octillion369
Death Knight(person)
XWiz
Are you hoping for a miracle?(review)
santo
The Host(review)
LostPsion
"Shut the Fuck Up" Theaters(idea)
Vanish
The line between normal and not(place)
Vanish
insanity(thing)
beatrice
You've been slowly taking me over for nearly a year, do you know that?(idea)
Berek
YouTube(thing)
shaogo
How to Pretend to Have a Job(idea)
hapax
Les Provinciales(review)
Everything 2 is brought to you by the letter C and The Everything Development Company