<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:base="http://everything2.com/">
    <title>PopeHypocriteIII's New Writeups</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://everything2.com/index.pl?node=Everything%20User%20Search&amp;usersearch=PopeHypocriteIII" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="?node=New%20Writeups%20Atom%20Feed&amp;type=ticker&amp;foruser=PopeHypocriteIII" />
    <id>http://everything2.com/?node=New%20Writeups%20Atom%20Feed&amp;foruser=PopeHypocriteIII</id>
    <updated>2005-01-05T00:25:03Z</updated>
<entry><title>speciesism (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII/writeups/speciesism"/><id>http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII/writeups/speciesism</id><author><name>PopeHypocriteIII</name><uri>http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII</uri></author><published>2005-01-05T00:25:03Z</published><updated>2005-01-05T00:25:03Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Since the publication of &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/title/Animal+Liberation&quot;&gt;Animal Liberation&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; in &lt;a href=&quot;/title/1975&quot;&gt;1975&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Peter+Singer&quot;&gt;Peter Singer&lt;/a&gt; has been one of the most vocal proponents of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/animal+rights&quot;&gt;animal rights&lt;/a&gt; reform and remains a controversial figure for the views he espouses. The following will concern itself in discussing his claim that the interests of non-&lt;a href=&quot;/title/human&quot;&gt;human&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/title/animal&quot;&gt;animals&lt;/a&gt; deserve consideration equal to those of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/human+being&quot;&gt;human beings&lt;/a&gt;, as well as in ascertaining the strength of that claim. To this latter end, throughout the course of the analysis I will examine whether there are any relevant exceptions or differences between the human situation and that of other animals that would alter the strength of his case. By way of introduction, I will first discuss Peter Singer's arguments against what he perceives as species-based &lt;a href=&quot;/title/discrimination&quot;&gt;discrimination&lt;/a&gt; and the unequal consideration of non-human interests which results from it. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To begin, Singer challenges two commonly-held conceits. Firstly, that all humans are equal in &lt;a href=&quot;/title/moral&quot;&gt;moral&lt;/a&gt; status and, secondly, that all&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Epicureanism (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII/writeups/Epicureanism"/><id>http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII/writeups/Epicureanism</id><author><name>PopeHypocriteIII</name><uri>http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII</uri></author><published>2005-01-04T10:12:22Z</published><updated>2005-01-04T10:12:22Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;As an &lt;a href=&quot;/title/ethics&quot;&gt;ethical&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/title/hedonism&quot;&gt;hedonist&lt;/a&gt;, the search for &lt;a href=&quot;/title/pleasure&quot;&gt;pleasure&lt;/a&gt; defined &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Epicurus&quot;&gt;Epicurus&lt;/a&gt;' teachings. This cannot be understated, for he related all human aspirations and actions to it. Leaving minutiae by the wayside for the moment, we must concede that there are sensations which human beings find preferable to others and which they feel driven to seek. Given this, Epicurus held pleasure to be central to human existence because, as he reasoned, &quot;every act of choice and aversion originates with it.&quot;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;b&gt;1&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; That is to say, the efficacy and desirability of all choices are evaluated by determining the amount of pleasure which results from them. Consequently, we may conclude that it comprises the most influential force and the ultimate goal to the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Epicurean&quot;&gt;Epicurean&lt;/a&gt; mindset; the &quot;primary native good&quot;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;b&gt;2&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; of humankind, which naturally motivates human activity.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At this point, however, the matter becomes more complex. Although Epicurus regarded all forms and means of pleasure to be&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Minoan (thing)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII/writeups/Minoan"/><id>http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII/writeups/Minoan</id><author><name>PopeHypocriteIII</name><uri>http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII</uri></author><published>2004-08-02T09:31:38Z</published><updated>2004-08-02T09:31:38Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Around 6000 BCE, settlers from &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Asia+Minor&quot;&gt;Asia Minor&lt;/a&gt; (modern &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Turkey&quot;&gt;Turkey&lt;/a&gt;) migrated to the island of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Crete&quot;&gt;Crete&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Aegean+Sea&quot;&gt;Aegean Sea&lt;/a&gt;; by 2500 BCE, a prosperous and technologically advanced &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Bronze+Age&quot;&gt;Bronze Age&lt;/a&gt; culture had arisen. Almost completely unknown until the discovery (in &lt;a href=&quot;/title/1900&quot;&gt;1900&lt;/a&gt;) of a great palace at &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Knossos&quot;&gt;Knossos&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Sir+Arthur+Evans&quot;&gt;Sir Arthur Evans&lt;/a&gt;, the British archaeologist who coined the term '&lt;a href=&quot;/title/Minoan&quot;&gt;Minoan&lt;/a&gt;' (after the legend of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/King+Minos&quot;&gt;King Minos&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Minotaur&quot;&gt;Minotaur&lt;/a&gt;), this culture is widely considered to be the first European civilisation. Minoan &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Crete&quot;&gt;Crete&lt;/a&gt; is regarded as one of the three founding cultures of ancient &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Greece&quot;&gt;Greece&lt;/a&gt;, the others being the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Cycladic&quot;&gt;Cycladic&lt;/a&gt; (so named for the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Cyclades&quot;&gt;Cyclades&lt;/a&gt;, where it developed) and the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Mycenae&quot;&gt;Mycenaean&lt;/a&gt; (which developed on the mainland during the later &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Helladic+Period&quot;&gt;Helladic Period&lt;/a&gt;). Of these three, Minoan Crete rose to prominence first and, perhaps, most spectacularly; individual aspects of Minoan culture (such as art, architecture, religion and language) will be covered in greater detail later. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The chronology of the&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Europe and the Other (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII/writeups/Europe+and+the+Other"/><id>http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII/writeups/Europe+and+the+Other</id><author><name>PopeHypocriteIII</name><uri>http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII</uri></author><published>2004-06-14T08:12:18Z</published><updated>2004-06-14T08:12:18Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;big&gt;&lt;b&gt;The European Ideal&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/big&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As the world progressed towards modernity, the nations of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Europe&quot;&gt;Europe&lt;/a&gt; fought vigorously to attain security in their identities and, swept along by the phenomenon of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/imperialism&quot;&gt;imperialism&lt;/a&gt;, to relate those identities to the wider world. In order to come to terms with this, intense debate and speculation was undertaken in order to define what Europe was by juxtaposing it with and pitting it against what it was not, the intent being to demonstrate that European &lt;a href=&quot;/title/civilisation&quot;&gt;civilisation&lt;/a&gt; was unique and superior in the world and, most importantly, that its identity was &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; than a matter of mere geography. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Based both in fact and fiction, the apparent need to achieve delineation gave rise to theories which held issues of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/race&quot;&gt;race&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;/title/gender&quot;&gt;gender&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;/title/sexuality&quot;&gt;sexuality&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;/title/class&quot;&gt;class&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/title/religion&quot;&gt;religion&lt;/a&gt; to be central and paramount in defining the European identity and likewise in deciding bases for exclusion; such theories were heroically ambitious (if usually unsound) as the diverse,&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Europe until the Modern Era (idea)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII/writeups/Europe+until+the+Modern+Era"/><id>http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII/writeups/Europe+until+the+Modern+Era</id><author><name>PopeHypocriteIII</name><uri>http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII</uri></author><published>2004-05-20T13:25:40Z</published><updated>2004-05-20T13:25:40Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;big&gt;Introduction&lt;/big&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The means by which Europe was transformed from an inchoate mass of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/feudal+system&quot;&gt;feudal&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/title/monarchy&quot;&gt;monarchies&lt;/a&gt; into modern &lt;a href=&quot;/title/nation-state&quot;&gt;nation-states&lt;/a&gt; is, understandably, ambiguous. One significant trend, though, is the movement away from &lt;a href=&quot;/title/feudalism&quot;&gt;feudalism&lt;/a&gt; (embodied by both monarchy and &lt;a href=&quot;/title/papacy&quot;&gt;papacy&lt;/a&gt;) and towards &lt;a href=&quot;/title/nationalism&quot;&gt;nationalism&lt;/a&gt; (in various forms), with entrenched concepts of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/law&quot;&gt;law&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/title/civil+rights&quot;&gt;civil rights&lt;/a&gt;. Another is the natural tendency for &lt;a href=&quot;/title/polemic&quot;&gt;polemic&lt;/a&gt; ideologies to have provoked strong reactions from their opposites, thereby creating a competitive environment in which each was consistently required to confront challengers. Most significantly of all, though, is the constant factor of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Europe&quot;&gt;Europe&lt;/a&gt;'s perpetual political disunity which leads to the primary assertions contained herein: firstly, that the condition of modern Europe's surviving ideologies are the product of intense conflict and, secondly, that this actually means very little. While cosmetically the change has been&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry><entry><title>Muscovy (place)</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII/writeups/Muscovy"/><id>http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII/writeups/Muscovy</id><author><name>PopeHypocriteIII</name><uri>http://www.everything2.org:80/user/PopeHypocriteIII</uri></author><published>2004-01-24T20:39:33Z</published><updated>2004-01-24T20:39:33Z</updated>
<content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;big&gt;&lt;b&gt;In the Beginning...&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/big&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The chain of events which led to the foundation of Muscovy and its eventual emergence as a &lt;a href=&quot;/title/sovereignty&quot;&gt;sovereign&lt;/a&gt; power is lengthy and convoluted. Among the many difficulties it faced in its ascent were lengthy subjection to the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Golden+Horde&quot;&gt;Golden Horde&lt;/a&gt;, raids conducted by fragmenting &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Mongol&quot;&gt;Mongol&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/title/khanate&quot;&gt;khanates&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Timur&quot;&gt;Timur&lt;/a&gt;'s rogue lieutenants, a &lt;a href=&quot;/title/civil+war&quot;&gt;civil war&lt;/a&gt; (instigated by &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Iurii+Dmitrievich&quot;&gt;Iurii Dmitrievich&lt;/a&gt;, following a dispute over the system of succession instituted by &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Vasilii+I&quot;&gt;Vasilii I&lt;/a&gt;) and the waning of &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Byzantine+Empire&quot;&gt;Byzantine&lt;/a&gt; power (and so too the power of the &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Orthodox+Church&quot;&gt;Orthodox Church&lt;/a&gt;). Even then, &lt;a href=&quot;/title/Russian+history&quot;&gt;Russian history&lt;/a&gt; is characterised by internal disputes, as each city strove to best its neighbours (although it must be remembered that each city claimed territory equivalent to that of a western &lt;a href=&quot;/title/European&quot;&gt;European&lt;/a&gt; kingdom). Amid the clamour, Muscovy became the dominant power. It must be understood why this is the case and what ramifications this fact has before a &lt;a href=&quot;/title/chronology&quot;&gt;chronology&lt;/a&gt; of events and policies&amp;hellip;</content>
</entry></feed>
